SB I-25 On Ramp over LRT Denver County, Colorado Bridge Inspection Report (2024)

  1. Data Central
  2. Bridge Inspections
  3. U.S.
  4. Colorado
  5. Denver
  6. SB I-25 On Ramp over LRT

Search

Bridge Inspections

Map

  • SB I-25 On Ramp over LRT Denver County, Colorado Bridge Inspection Report (1)Good condition
  • SB I-25 On Ramp over LRT Denver County, Colorado Bridge Inspection Report (2)Meets minimum tolerable limits
  • SB I-25 On Ramp over LRT Denver County, Colorado Bridge Inspection Report (3)Needs repair or corrective action
  • SB I-25 On Ramp over LRT Denver County, Colorado Bridge Inspection Report (4)Closed
  • SB I-25 On Ramp over LRT Denver County, Colorado Bridge Inspection Report (5)Report not available

Basic Information

County, State: Denver County, ColoradoStructure Number: F-17-NQ
Maintenance Responsibility: State Highway AgencyOwnership: State Highway Agency
Facility Carried By Structure: SB I-25 On RampFeatures Intersected (Location): LRT (At I-25 & Evans Ave)
Year Built: 2005Year Reconstructed: N/A
Average Daily Traffic (Year): 207,000 (2020) with 5% truck trafficFuture Average Daily Traffic (Year): 260,820 (2040)

NBI Report

NBI Bridge Condition Good
Inspection Date (Inspection Frequency): March 2022 (Every 24 Months)
Structural Evaluation: 7: Better than present minimum criteria
Deck Geometry6: Equal to present minimum criteria
Underclear/Vertical and Horizontal: 3: Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrective action
Deck7: GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
Superstructure7: GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
Substructure7: GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
Channel/Channel ProtectionN: Not applicable. Use when bridge is not over a waterway (channel).
CulvertsN: Not applicable. Use if structure is not a culvert.
Waterway Adequacy: N: Bridge not over a waterway.
Approach Roadway Alignment: 8: Equal to present desirable criteria
Bridge PostingNo posting required: Equal to or above legal loads
Scour Critical Bridges: N: Bridge not over waterway.
Bridge Railings: 1: Inspected feature meets currently acceptable standards.
Transitions: 1: Inspected feature meets currently acceptable standards.
Approach Guardrail: 1: Inspected feature meets currently acceptable standards.
Approach Guardrail Ends: 1: Inspected feature meets currently acceptable standards.
Historical significance: 5: Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.

More Information

Designated Level of ServiceRamp, Wye, Connector, etc.
Route Number: 0025A
Kilometerpoint: 0.105
LRS Inventory Route: 025A_E_379
Subroute Number: 0
Bypass/Detour Length: 2.00 kilometers
Toll: On free road. The structure is toll-free and carries a toll-free highway.
Functional Class Of Inventory Route: Urban: Principal Arterial - Interstate
Lanes On Structure: 2
Lanes Under Structure: 0
Design Load: MS 22.5 or HS 25
Approach Roadway Width: 9.80 meters
Bridge Median: No median
Skew: 45
Structure Flared: No flare
Navigation Control: No navigation control on waterway (bridge permit not required).
Navigation Vertical Clearance: 0.00 meters
Navigation Horizontal Clearance: 0.00 meters
Structure Open/Posted/Closed: Open, no restriction
Type of Service On Bridge: Highway
Type of Service Under Bridge: Railroad
Kind of Material/Design: Prestressed concrete *
Type of Design/Construction: Box Beam or Girders - Multiple
Kind of Material/Design: Other
Type of Design/Construction: Other
Number Of Spans In Main Unit: 1
Number Of Approach Spans: 0
Inventory Route Total Horizontal Clearance: 9.80 meters
Length Of Maximum Span: 16.10 meters
Structure Length: 17.20 meters
Left Curb/Sidewalk Width: 0.00 meters
Right Curb/Sidewalk Width: 0.00 meters
Bridge Roadway Width Curb-To-Curb: 9.80 meters
Deck Width/Out-To-Out: 44.60 meters
Minimum Vertical Clearance Over Bridge Roadway: 30.45 meters
Reference Feature: Railroad beneath structure
Minimum Vertical Under Clearance: 4.95 meters
Reference Feature: Railroad beneath structure
Minimum Lateral Under Clearance: 2.70 meters
Minimum Lateral Under Clearance On Left: 2.70 meters
Operating Rating (Method): 89.80 metric tons(Load Factor (LF))
Inventory Rating (Methon): 43.30 metric tons (Load Factor (LF))
STRAHNET Highway Designation: The inventory route is on a Interstate STRAHNET route.
Parallel Structure Designation: No parallel structure exists.
Direction Of Traffic: 1-way traffic
Highway System Of Inventory Route: Inventory Route is on the NHS
Federal Lands Highways: Not applicable
Deck Structure Type: Concrete Precast Panels
Type of Wearing Surface: Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck)
Type of Membrane: None
Deck Protection: Epoxy Coated Reinforcing
Designated National Network: The inventory route is part
NBIS Bridge Length: Yes

'; popupContent += '

'; popupContent += ''; popupContent += '
'+feature.properties.pctnfc+'%of bridges need repair or closed

'; popupContent += '

'; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += '
Total # of Bridges'+feature.properties.total+'
Bridges need repair or corrective action'+feature.properties.nf+'
Closed'+feature.properties.cl+'
NumberPercent
Rated Poor by USDOT'+feature.properties.poor+''+feature.properties.pctpoor+'
Structurally Deficient'+feature.properties.sd+''+feature.properties.pctsd+'

'; popupContent += '

More

'; return popupContent; }//{"type": "Feature","properties":{"gid":"01001", "name":"Autauga County, AL", "slug":"autauga", "stslug":"alabama", "year":"2018", "total":"117", "nf":"14", "nfc":"14", "cl":"0", "pctnfc":"11.97","poor":"4","pctpoor":"3.42","sd":"4","pctsd":"3.42","fo":"16","pctfo":"13.68","fc":"#e6b414","pc":"#00f014"},"geometry": {"type": "MultiPolygon","coordinates":US01001}} function onBridgeFeature(feature) { if(feature.properties.ost == 'good'){var ost = 'Good/Fair';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'poor'){var ost = 'Meets minimum tolerable limits';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'repair'){var ost = 'Needs repair or corrective action';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'closed'){var ost = 'Closed';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'N/A'){var ost = 'Report Not Available';}; if(feature.properties.bc == 'F'){var bc = 'Fair';} else if(feature.properties.bc == 'G'){var bc = 'Good';} else if(feature.properties.bc == 'P'){var bc = 'Poor';}; if(feature.properties.sd == 'y'){var sd = '
Structurally Deficient';} else { var sd = '';} if(feature.properties.fo == 'y'){var fo = '
Functionally Obsolete';} else { var fo = '';} var popupContent = "";// var popupContent = "

I started out as a GeoJSON " + feature.geometry.type + ", but now I'm a Leaflet vector!

"; popupContent += '

'+feature.properties.name+'

'; popupContent += '

'; if (feature.properties.idte != ''){popupContent += '';} popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += '
NBI Inspection Date'+feature.properties.idte+'
Overall Status'+ost+'
NBI Bridge Condition'+bc+sd+fo+'
Sufficiency Rating'+feature.properties.sr+'
Structural Evaluation'+feature.properties.item67+': '+feature.properties.stru+'
Deck Geometry'+feature.properties.item68+': '+feature.properties.deck+'

'; popupContent += '

More

'; return popupContent; } var CntyBridgesJSON = { "type": "FeatureCollection", "features":BridgeJSONData };// var CntyBridgesJSON = { "type": "FeatureCollection", "features":[] };mapboxgl.accessToken = 'pk.eyJ1IjoieXB5dW4iLCJhIjoiY2oxcW4ybWhxMDBkMjJxcGVhbDV5cnpzYyJ9.oFQSnOc57xCR7A51OR6-3w'; //ck0flqufl2k1x1cpmupm5sl2yvar map = new mapboxgl.Map({container: 'bridgeMap', style: 'mapbox://styles/ypyun/cj83a8ga5abkq2sqpivw3nrzg',center: [-104.93368611,39.67775], zoom: 14, attributionControl: false, });map.addControl(new mapboxgl.AttributionControl({ compact: false, customAttribution:['Map Icons Collection'] })); var STLINE = {"type":"FeatureCollection", "features":[ {"type":"Feature","properties":{"GEO_ID":"08031","NAME":"State","VAL":0,"VALstr":"","VALper":"","FC":"#FFF",},"geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":US08031 }}, ]}; // ptype detailmap.on('style.load', function() { var layers = map.getStyle().layers; var firstSymbolId; for (var i = 0; i < layers.length; i++) { if (layers[i].type === 'symbol') { firstSymbolId = layers[i].id; break; } } map.addSource('bridges', {type: 'geojson', data: CntyBridgesJSON }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_green.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('green', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_yellow.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('yellow', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_red.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('red', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_black.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('black', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_white.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('white', image); }); map.addLayer({"id": "bridge_point", "type": "symbol", "source": "bridges", "filter":["all", ["==","m","y"]], "layout": {"visibility":"visible", "icon-image": '{grade}', 'icon-allow-overlap':true},}); map.on('click', "bridge_point", function (e) {new mapboxgl.Popup({ offset: 14 }).setLngLat(e.lngLat).setHTML(onBridgeFeature(e.features[0])).addTo(map);}); map.on('mouseenter', "bridge_point", function () {map.getCanvas().style.cursor = 'pointer'; }); map.on('mouseleave', "bridge_point", function () {map.getCanvas().style.cursor = '';}); map.addLayer({ "id": "stline", "type": "line", "source": { "type": "geojson", "data":STLINE }, "paint": {'line-color':"#333", 'line-opacity':0.9, 'line-width': 2.0 }},firstSymbolId);}); map.addControl(new mapboxgl.NavigationControl(), 'top-left');map.flyTo({ center: [-104.93368611,39.67775], zoom: 14, speed: 3, curve: 1, easing: function (t) { return t; } });

SB I-25 On Ramp over LRT Denver County, Colorado Bridge Inspection Report (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lilliana Bartoletti

Last Updated:

Views: 5651

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (53 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lilliana Bartoletti

Birthday: 1999-11-18

Address: 58866 Tricia Spurs, North Melvinberg, HI 91346-3774

Phone: +50616620367928

Job: Real-Estate Liaison

Hobby: Graffiti, Astronomy, Handball, Magic, Origami, Fashion, Foreign language learning

Introduction: My name is Lilliana Bartoletti, I am a adventurous, pleasant, shiny, beautiful, handsome, zealous, tasty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.